# Proving a nice pattern

Over on reddit, noncognitivism posted a nice sequence s/he had come across:

$4 + 1 = 5 = \sqrt{ (1)(2)(3)(4) + 1 }$
$(4+6) + 1 = 11 = \sqrt{ (2)(3)(4)(5) + 1}$
$(4+6+8) + 1 = 19 = \sqrt{ (3)(4)(5)(6) + 1}$
$…$
$(4+6+ … + (2k+2)) + 1 = \sqrt{ k(k+1)(k+2)(k+3) + 1 }$

Lovely. But why?

Well, the left hand side is an arithmetic series (with one added on) - in Core 1 terms, $a = 4$ and $d=2$, so its sum is $\frac{k}{2}\left[ 2(4) + (k-1)(2) \right] = \frac{k}{2} \left[ 8 + 2(k-1)\right] = k(k+3)$, nicely enough. So, we have that the left hand side is $k^2 + 3k + 1$.

The obvious - read, tedious - thing to do here would be to square both sides, multiply everything out and show we get two identical quartics. Yawn. And, strictly, not valid as a proof technique.

Instead, we’re going to do something clevererer, that involves no multiplying out at all: we’re going to gradually manipulate the left hand side into the same form as the right hand side. First up, it’s got a square root, so let’s throw one of those at it:

$k^2 + 3k + 1 = \sqrt{(k^2 + 3k + 1)^2}$

Then it ends with a +1. Now, we can’t just add one unless we subtract one too:

$k^2 + 3k + 1 = \sqrt{(k^2 + 3k + 1)^2-1 + 1}$

But oh, lookit, we’ve got the difference of two squares in there!

$k^2 + 3k + 1 = \sqrt{(k^2 + 3k)(k^2 + 3k + 2) + 1}$

And some quick factorising:

$k^2 + 3k + 1 = \sqrt{k(k+3)(k+2)(k+1) + 1}$

Oh, and let’s put it in the same order as we had to begin with:

$k^2 + 3k + 1 = \sqrt{k(k+1)(k+2)(k+3) + 1}~\blacksquare$ ## Colin

Colin is a Weymouth maths tutor, author of several Maths For Dummies books and A-level maths guides. He started Flying Colours Maths in 2008. He lives with an espresso pot and nothing to prove.

### 6 comments on “Proving a nice pattern”

• ##### oldandrewuk

Personal opinion, I think the LHS would look more pleasing if, instead of being a series of even numbers starting at 4 with “+1” on the end, it was a series of even numbers starting with 2 and with “-1” on the end. Just doesn’t feel right to start with 4.

• ##### Colin

Oh! So:
$2 – 1 = 1 = \sqrt{ (0)(1)(2)(3) + 1}$
$(2+4)-1 = 5 = \sqrt{ (1)(2)(3)(4) + 1}$

Yes, I like that!

• ##### oldandrewuk

Hadn’t even thought of that, but yes, that way gives you another easier term to start with.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.