# Ask Uncle Colin: a load of balls

Dear Uncle Colin,

I struggled with a problem where you had 5 blue balls and

xgreen balls, and the probability of picking two blue balls out of the bag was $\frac{5}{14}$. I can’t really see where to start!-Baffled About Likelihood, Lacking Startpoint

Hi, BALLS, thanks for your message!

This is the kind of question that tests your abstract thinking - taking something you know how to do with numbers and asking you to do it with algebraic expressions instead.

### With numbers

If you knew what *x* was - suppose it’s 7 - you’d be able to work out the probability of getting two blue balls out without too much bother: the probability of the first ball being blue would be $\frac{5}{5+7}$ and the second ball also being blue would be $\frac{4}{4+7}$. You’d then multiply those together to get the probability of both, which is $\frac{20}{12 \times 11} = \frac{5}{33}$ after a bit of cancelling.

Sadly, that’s not the answer we’re after, since it’s not $\frac{5}{14}$.

### But with algebra…

… you do *exactly the same*. Instead of 7, you put an *x*. The probability of the first ball being blue is $\frac{5}{5+x}$ and the second, $\frac{4}{4+x}$. Multiplying those gives a slightly messy $\frac{20}{(5+x)(4+x)}$, and we know that must equal $\frac{5}{14}$.

We have the same thing written two different ways, so we can make an equation: $\frac{20}{(5+x)(4+x)} = \frac{5}{14}$.

### Now deal with the fractions

Multiplying each side by the pair of brackets on the bottom on the left, and by 14, gives: 280 = 5(5 + *x*)(4 + *x*), which is already a lot nicer - but can be made nicer still if you divide everything by 5.

56 = (5 + *x*)(4 + *x*).

### The standard approach

The standard way to tackle this is to expand the right hand side and simplify into a quadratic in the usual form, then solve it: 56 = 20 + 9*x* + *x_2, so _x_2 + 9_x* − 36 = 0.

That factorises as (*x* + 12)(*x* − 3)=0, which means *x* = −12 (not possible, unless someone has invented negative balls) or *x* = 3.

### A bit more piratey

If you know 56 = (5 + *x*)(4 + *x*), and spot that the first bracket is one more than the second, you might spot that 5 + *x* = 8 and 4 + *x* = 7 would be an excellent solution to the equation - making *x* = 3 directly.

The downside to this approach is that you have to check there are no others - 5 + *x* = −7 and 4 + *x* = −8 would also work, giving *x* = −12, although that’s impossible (as above).

Hope that helps!

- Uncle Colin

* Edited 2018-11-07 to turn a 5 into a 7.